For those of you who have been following this blog for a long time, I’ve consistently refined this article as my understanding of the nature of God’s Creation of attraction Part 3 and the differences between sexual attraction and arousal has increased.
This may be the final major piece of the puzzle as I’ve been thinking about this for more and more years, but perhaps it can be refined more in the future. However, I’ve decided to leave it as Part 4 for now instead of the Final take as there might be some slight revisions in the future.
I’ve been thinking about and refining this over the past couple months and been busy which is why I haven’t been posting as much. However, things are still going to be a bit slow until I can get more time in real life.
Topics:
- The lens of heaven — marriage is an earthly institution
- The lens of earth — the context surrounding the creation of marriage
- The purpose of marriage as an earthly institution
- What is attractive to both sexes?
- Understanding how attraction plays into the roles and responsibilities of marriage
- New Testament Scriptures reinforce God’s Old Testament design of creation
- Exploring the Scriptures on attraction and sex
- Other Biblical pitfalls of downplaying attraction
- Conclusion
The lens of heaven — marriage is an earthly institution
Marriage is an earthly institution.
Matthew 22:23 On that day some Sadducees (who say there is no resurrection) came to Jesus and questioned Him, 24 asking, “Teacher, Moses said, ‘If a man dies having no children, his brother as next of kin shall marry his wife, and raise up children for his brother.’ 25 Now there were seven brothers with us; and the first married and died, and having no children left his wife to his brother; 26 so also the second, and the third, down to the seventh. 27 Last of all, the woman died. 28 In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife of the seven will she be? For they all had married her.”
29 But Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, not understanding the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
Jesus gives us some interesting insight into heaven. There’s no marriage there.
This means that marriage is a covenant institution between a husband, wife, and God, but it is also mainly an earthly institution. The earthly institution of marriage does not transcend to heaven nor do any of the beings in heaven marry.
In Revelation the marriage of the Lamb occurs before the new heaven and new earth is created when Jesus comes back again.
Revelation 19:7 Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb has come and His bride has made herself ready.” … 9 Then he *said to me, “Write, ‘Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.’” And he *said to me, “These are true words of God.” …
Revelation 21:1 Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and there is no longer any sea. 2 And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 And I heard a loud voice from the throne, saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will [a]dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself will be among them, 4 and He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and there will no longer be any death; there will no longer be any mourning, or crying, or pain; the first things have passed away.”
Theologically, the marriage of Christ and His bride is literally uniting us and making us one with Him. The ordering of events is Jesus’ second coming back to earth to marry His bride, the judgment occurs in Revelation 20, and after that is the new heaven and earth in Revelation 21.
The marriage of Jesus and His bride occurs before the new heaven and new earth is created and the temporal things associated with the old earth and old heaven pass away. One of those temporal things that passes away is the earthly institution of marriage as is written about in Matthew.
In other words, Jesus must marry His bride before the institution of marriage is abolished when the new heaven and new earth are created. Since marriage is an earthly institution and not heavenly, Jesus marries His bride on the earth.
The lens of earth — the context surrounding the creation of marriage
Now that we understand marriage is primarily an earthly institution, we should understand that its function is to address earthly needs.
To understand marriage addressing earthly needs, we need to go back to the God’s Creation as He had a purpose there. Let’s examine the status of man in the garden in both Creation accounts. Genesis 1 is considered the first creation account, which gives an overview of all of the creation. Genesis 2 is considered the second creation account, which gives an overview into the creation of man specifically.
Genesis 1:26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the [ak]sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28 God blessed them; and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 Then God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree which has fruit yielding seed; it shall be food for you; 30 and to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the sky and to every thing that moves on the earth which has life, I have given every green plant for food”; and it was so. 31 God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.
God’s commands to man were two fold in the first creation account in Genesis 1:
- Rule and subdue the earth — 26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” […] 28b and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
- Be fruitful and multiply — 28a God blessed them; and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth,
We will come back to these two commands after the next point.
Genesis 2:15 Then the Lord God took the man and put him into the garden of Eden to cultivate it and keep it. 16 The Lord God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may eat freely; 17 but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die.”
God has two more commands:
- Cultivate and keep the garden (directed to Adam and not Eve)
- Don’t eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil
18 Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.” 19 Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. 20 The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him.
21 So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. 22 The Lord God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. 23 The man said,“This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; She shall be called Woman, Because she was taken out of Man.” 24 For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh. 25 And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.
Genesis 2 gives us more details about the ordering of creation. Man was created first, but there was no helper suitable for him. Hence, God created a helper suitable for him.
- The first command — rule and subdue the earth — could be fulfilled by Adam himself such as taking dominion over the beasts as they came to him and gave them names (Genesis 2). However, Eve could help with that.
- The second command — be fruitful and multiply — was unable to be fulfilled without Eve.
- The third command — cultivate and keep the garden — was being tended to by Adam but Eve could help with.
- The fourth command — Obey God: do not eat of the tree — Eve could obey as well.
God knew before the animals were created and brought before Adam that he had no helper suitable for him. I believe God had this in mind before he did all of this simply because of the examples of sexual dimorphism — two sexes — within the animals he created as well. Indeed, to Adam’s male God wanted to create a female helper for him not only for the loneliness but to fulfill the rest of the command to be fruitful and multiply.
All of these lead into God putting Adam to sleep, taking out a rib, forming Eve (who was still unnamed), and giving her to Adam as an example of the first marriage.
As a side note, Adam was given work in the garden as a steward already, but it was multiplied in punishment. This relates to Genesis 3 and the punishments that God gave for sinning. However, it is important to realize that Adam is already the head of Eve in the way marriage was created.
The purpose of marriage as an earthly institution
To understand the purpose of marriage, we need to examine what tends to drive relationship and marriage formation. Sexual attraction appears to be one of the primary drivers. Thus, since God created man, woman, and marriage we should assume that there is some intent of the Creator behind the phenomena of sexual attraction.
What is sexually attractive to both sexes?
Generally speaking, attraction is different between both sexes.
- Men are primarily attracted to physical beauty and femininity. Examples of physical beauty are a woman’s face and her figure like waist to hip ratio. Examples of femininity are long hair and female-only attire like dresses and skirts. These things are sexually attractive to men.
- Women are primarily attracted to PSALM traits and masculinity. PSALM is an acronym for power/personality, status, athleticism, looks, and money. Generally speaking, these are embodied in a man such as a confident, handsome, ambitious, successful leader. Masculinity also embodies many traits that correlate with this such as strong, confident, independent, driven, tough skinned, competitive, and so on.
Yes, there are exceptions. Yes, these are generalizations. We’re not discussing them now.
These are the things that are primarily [sexually] attractive to both sexes. There is a reason for this.
Understanding how attraction plays into the roles and responsibilities of marriage
We, as humans, implicitly understand that attraction — by very definition of the word — is a driving force for marriage. Indeed, typically no one really gets married to someone that they don’t find attractive. If you were a Creator, it would make sense that the commands given to man for marriage would directly apply to the things that attract men and women to marriage. After all, these things are to be a preparation for the roles and responsibilities of marriage.
Even in cultures with arranged marriages such as Judaism, the two getting married were required to see each other and they had some influence in terms of veto power over the person they would get married. The families of the two parties ‘set them up’ on ‘arranged dates’ that they had to go on to get to know each other. There had to be agreement from all sides, including the two getting married. Very few cultures, if any, have forced marriages.
Now, relating this back to the Scriptures in Genesis 1 and 2 we can logically see how attraction plays into the various roles and responsibilities given to men and women in marriage. The commands of God are directly related to what we find attractive in the opposite sex.
- Rule and subdue the earth
- Be fruitful and multiply
- Cultivate and keep the garden
- Obey God
and
- Men are primarily attracted to physical beauty and femininity. Examples of physical beauty are a woman’s face and her figure like waist to hip ratio. Examples of femininity are long hair and female-only attire like dresses and skirts. These things are [sexually] attractive to men.
- Women are primarily attracted to PSALM traits and masculinity. PSALM is an acronym for power/personality, status, athleticism, looks, and money. Generally speaking, these are embodied in a man such as a confident, handsome, ambitious, successful leader. Masculinity also embodies many traits that correlate with this such as strong, confident, independent, driven, tough skinned, competitive, and so on.
Thus,
- Men were commanded to rule and subdue the earth: hence, confident, ambitious, successful leaders are likely to do that. It’s no surprise that Scripture tells men that they are to be Protectors and Providers for their wives and families. A confident leader won’t back down from Protecting his wife when necessary or sacrificing himself as Jesus did for us such as in Numbers 30 and Ephesians 5. An ambitious, successful husband can easily provide for his family such as in Exodus 21 and 1 Timothy 5:8.
- Woman was created as man’s helper and so that he wouldn’t be alone. Eve was created to be a primary help for multiplying and filling the earth, and secondary help for ruling and subduing the earth and cultivating and keeping the garden. Beauty is a general proxy for healthiness and fertility because it signals less genetic errors and ability to bear children. Waist to hip ratios or curves garners a lot of attention by men because they are attractive, but they are also related to a woman’s health and her ability to bear healthy children.
As you can see, these are a good fit for the purpose of Creation and what we observe in real life.
New Testament Scriptures reinforce God’s Old Testament design of Creation
It should be clear that Adam had headship prior to the fall. God creates Adam first and then Eve as Adam’s helper. There’s other textual information in the link to corroborate that statement. However, this is also backed up by the stated commands in the New Testament. The NT Scriptures delineate the roles and responsibilities of the husbands and wives as thus (e.g. Ephesians 5, 1 Corinthians 7 and 11, Colossians 3, Titus 2, 1 Peter 3, 1 Tim 2 and 5, etc.)
- Husband — Headship, love your wife for the purpose of sanctification, live with your wife in an understanding way, don’t become embittered at your wife, provide for your family, etc.
- Wife — Submit to your husband, respect your husband, have affection for your husband, main focus should be on the home and childbirthing, etc
These directly align with not only the Creation commands and intent but also with what we observe. The husband’s headship directly aligns with ruling, obeying God, provision and protection of his wife and family. The wife’s submission directly aligns with being her husband’s helper and being a mother aligns with being fruitful and multiplying.
This does not seem to be a mistake unlike the failed egalitarian argument. Since God created woman’s attraction to operate on the principle of hypergamy, we can see how she would be attracted to and respect her the husband as he was appointed to lead, protect, and provide for his family. If you try to depose of headship or any of the other parts of the design, you are deposing of God’s design intent which more likely leads to a failed marriage. A wife that doesn’t follow her husband and disrespects him and is rebellious is only one signature away from divorce.
All in all, there appears to be a consistent affirmation of the the roles and responsibilities of men and women at creation, in the OT, and in the NT that also demonstrate what the sexes tend to find attractive in each other.
This should not be a surprise. God’s design was planned from the beginning of creation and continues to persist through time.
Exploring the Scriptures on attraction and sex
Much of the modern Church has fallen ignorantly into the lie that godliness is attractive. This is the Christian ought fallacy which follows that ‘because godliness is a good thing it should be what is attractive.’ However, when we examine NT Scriptures, we find this to be false.
Paul tells the Corinthians in 2 Corinthians 6 to marry believers and not unbelievers. ‘What fellowship does light have with darkness and darkness with light?’ If godliness and good character were attractive, everyone would be attracted to Christians. That’s clearly false. Rather, it’s the case that any man exhibiting PSALM traits and masculinity will be attractive to women and they will not necessarily be believers or not. This is why Paul warns not to marry unbelievers because some were attractive but bad choices for marriage.
Similarly, Paul states in 1 Corinthians 7 the only reason given in the NT to marry: “it is better to marry than to burn.” In fact, it is even ideal or at least preferable [to him] that all men remain single as he so full attention can be focused toward the Lord. What are the things that cause us to burn for marriage? It is what sexually attracts us. This is the sex drive and beauty for men. This is the sex drive and strong, confident, handsome, ambitious, successful leaders for women. These are the things we look for in a mate, aside from important qualifiers such as godlines and character.
Why should women not usurp authority over man [in the Church and family] and why is she saved through childbearing in 1 Timothy 2? Because she is fulfilling the initial commands of God to be fruitful and multiply, and her offspring like Jesus will take dominion over the earth. Jesus added from the initial command of God to take dominion over the earth to also win the people of the earth through the gospel. Make disciples of all nations.
Another problem, from what I’ve seen, is not solely that the modern Church parrots false narratives about what is attractive to both men and women. That is definitely harmful. However, there is the issue that makes it seem like godliness is mutually exclusive with the traits that attract the opposite sex. For example, beauty is somehow mutually exclusive with godliness, which 1 Pet 3 does not say at all. Another example is that a successful, ambitious man may be looked on as ‘too worldly’ because money is evil when it is the love of money that is evil in 1 Tim 6. This is a problem because these things are false. You can be beautiful and godly. You can be a confident, ambitious, and successful Christian leader.
Other Biblical pitfalls of downplaying attraction
Generally speaking, the modern Church loves to downplay the role of attraction in marriage. I believe that this is because it is based on a faulty understanding of why attraction is important.
For example, it’s clear from the Scriptures that beauty is what is attractive to men. However, beauty without godliness and character has disastrous consequences result for men. They’re carried away to worship idols (e.g. Solomon and harem). They get caught in adultery (e.g. David and Bathsheba). They get scared into lying (e.g. Abraham, Sarah, Abimelech, and Pharaoh). They get dragged down into the pit (e.g. the vast majority of Proverbs on beautiful but deceitful women). The beauty of women is never downplayed. In fact, in Song of Songs Solomon lauds the beauty of the Shulamite woman the entire book without mentioning her character once.
Those who claim beauty is shallow fall into the trap of false humility. God created beauty, and beauty is objective. Some examples are nature, facial symmetry, a woman’s waist to hip ratio, and strong, muscular men. Without a God as an anchor, there can be no objective Truth such as beauty. Those who downplay beauty don’t understand the role it plays within marriage.
Obviously cultivating beauty or cultivating strong, confident, handsome, ambitious, successful leaders should not be placed over godliness and character. However, they are not mutually exclusive. Beauty is only vanity when focused in the wrong direction. Beauty for attention, beauty for power, beauty for other men are not good. However, beauty for a husband in marriage is good. Similarly, the same is true of the sex drive.
Dominion is baked into the cake for men
All of the traits that women admire and respect in men which lead toward their sexual attraction for men are based in dominion in various aspects. Some have more universal appeal, and some have contextual appeal.
The PSALM traits generally have universal appeal.
- Power
- Status
- Athleticism
- Looks
- Money
You can think of all of the top men in the world in these categories, and they almost always have what many men would consider a beautiful woman by their side.
The traits of masculinity also have universal appeal to women, so much so that they often try to be like men (feminism).
- Independence
- Dominance
- Assertiveness
- Strength
- Aggression
- Leadership
- Competitiveness
- Accountability
- Courage
- Stoicism
- Charisma
- Competence
Universal sexually attractive traits are also based on a scale and one can compensate substantially if they have crazy amounts of the others. One may not have the best looks, but if they are the Football team QB or they are the richest person in the area they still can garner attractive women, though caution is needed in such cases. Men with mainly money might invite more women who are into a lifestyle and gold diggers rather than one who actually wants to be her husband’s follower and helper.
Contextualized appeal are generally localized phenomena whereby men can be more attractive than others based on comparative positions.
- A man may not be objective attractive in many PSALM traits, but if he’s the local leader or popular player of a D&D crew the women who participate in D&D may be more attracted to him than the other men.
- Even if a man is not that attractive in many different areas, he may be able to generate some attraction if he’s in a leadership, mentor, or other type of position of prestige. The typical doctor and nurse, lawyer and secretary, and many other positions like these can imbue pseudo-respect that turns into real sexual attraction.
Additionally, as we covered in the prior post Institutional authority and Influential authority and how they interact with Genuine/Godly and Gentile authority, the most successful form of sexual attraction develops from influential authority rather than institutional authority.
It can be summarized in all of these traits listed — both universal and contextual — that they are all fall under the category of dominion. Some are more directly related to dominion than others such as power, but they all represent some form of mastery over various aspects of life that signal a man has capacity to operate effectively as the head of the marriage in leadership, protection, and provision — PSALMs, masculinity, and contextual areas. However, these traits must also be tempered with the fruit of the Spirit lest such men become dark triads or bad boys.
In short, women are attracted to dominion and its various forms. Dominion also crosses over from sexual attraction to sexual arousal in the right context.
Finally, if this does not make sense to any Christian, I have another compelling analogy. To use the headship analogy, Christ’s dominion over sin and death is what attracts the Church to Himself. Christ conquering sin and death and providing us a way to reconcile with God is the greatest feat of dominion of all time, and one that draws all men to Himself provided we have the humility to respect His willing sacrifice that while we were yet sinners He died for us.
Conclusion
Creation
In summary, the Scriptures describe that God directs commands to man and woman when He made them and married them. These are:
- Rule and subdue the earth
- Be fruitful and multiply
- Cultivate and keep the garden
- Obey God
If we look at them from an observational perspective, we see that these commands also fairly accurately describe what each sex finds attractive in the opposite sex.
and
- Men are primarily attracted to physical beauty and femininity. Examples of physical beauty are a woman’s face and her figure like waist to hip ratio. Examples of femininity are long hair and female-only attire like dresses and skirts. These things are [sexually] attractive to men.
- Women are primarily attracted to PSALM traits and masculinity. PSALM is an acronym for power/personality, status, athleticism, looks, and money. Generally speaking, these are embodied in a man such as a confident, handsome, ambitious, successful leader. Masculinity also embodies many traits that correlate with this such as strong, confident, independent, driven, tough skinned, competitive, and so on.
Thus,
- Men were commanded to rule and subdue the earth: hence, confident, ambitious, successful leaders are likely to do that. It’s no surprise that Scripture tells men that they are to be Protectors and Providers for their wives and families. A confident leader won’t back down from Protecting his wife when necessary or sacrificing himself as Jesus did for us such as in Numbers 30 and Ephesians 5. An ambitious, successful husband can easily provide for his family such as in Exodus 21 and 1 Timothy 5:8.
- Woman was created as man’s helper and so that he wouldn’t be alone. Eve was created to be a primary help for multiplying and filling the earth, and secondary help for ruling and subduing the earth and cultivating and keeping the garden. Beauty is a general proxy for healthiness and fertility because it signals less genetic errors and ability to bear children. Waist to hip ratios or curves garners a lot of attention by men because they are attractive, but they are also related to a woman’s health and her ability to bear healthy children.
There are multiple passages of Scripture both from the Old Testament and New Testament that affirm continually affirm these characteristics.
- Husband — Headship, love your wife for the purpose of sanctification, live with your wife in an understanding way, don’t become embittered at your wife, provide for your family, etc.
- Wife — Submit to your husband, respect your husband, have affection for your husband, main focus should be on the home and childbirthing, etc
In other words for men: rule your family well, obey God, cultivate and keep your family, and so on. For women: help your husband rule well, obey God, and help him be fruitful and multiply.
To use the headship analogy, Christ’s dominion over sin and death is what attracts the Church to Himself. Christ conquering sin and death and providing us a way to reconcile with God is the greatest feat of dominion of all time, and one that draws all men to Himself provided we have the humility to respect His willing sacrifice that while we were yet sinners He died for us.
These marital roles and responsibilities directly align with not only the Creation commands and intent but also with what we observe. The husband’s headship directly aligns with ruling, obeying God, provision and protection of his wife and family. In short, women are attracted to dominion both in sexual attraction and sexual arousal. The wife’s submission directly aligns with being her husband’s helper and being a mother aligns with being fruitful and multiplying.
We do both singles and married a disservice by downplaying the role attraction plays in marriage. If we don’t show them why, from the Scriptures, God created these traits to be important and attractive to the opposite sex we risk alienating them and/or giving them cognitive dissonance. Exceptions are exceptions. Hanging onto exceptions when you want to be married give you a low probability of success. Sure, some men marry obese women. Most men don’t. Sure, some women marry men the stereotype of a man in his parent’s basement playing video games all the time. Most women don’t.
“Oh? You want a beautiful wife? That’s shallow and superficial.” However, we implicitly understand that beauty is objective, at least in part. That creates strong cognitive dissonance in Christian men: “Oh, I shouldn’t want beauty? Then why do I desire a beautiful wife? Is beauty a bad thing? Why do I want a beautiful wife if beauty is superficial?” Sadly, this is too often the case.
That which God creates is beautiful. He created us, and we were very good. He created attraction and our sex drives. He created marriage. He command us to take dominion and be fruitful and multiply. The loving gaze of a husband on his beautiful bride. The respect of a wife toward her strong, confident husband. Our righteousness is our beautiful clothing to Jesus. The beauty of a large family.
All of these things come together to form a coherent whole that exemplifies the nature of the beauty of marriage and the plan that God created for us to accomplish.
Most power you can exert is by Yes and No.
Christianity and masculinity 