Oral contraception alters your brain

I found this article floating across my facebook page today titled Oral Contraceptive Pill Could Be Altering The Physical Structure Of Your Brain. Apparently, there was another one by the same author a couple months ago titled similarly that didn’t make very far Contraceptive Pill Associated With Changes In Brain Structure.

Some of the sciencec is quite interesting. This is from the second article:

Many women, however, experience unpleasant side effects, ranging from mood changes to androgenic effects, such as acne and unwanted hair growth. The latter are caused by the fact that some progestins (the synthetic versions of the hormone progesterone used in oral contraceptives) interact with androgen receptors. The androgens, such as testosterone, are steroid hormones that are responsible for male characteristics. Some progestins have high androgenic activity and therefore increase the chances of androgen-related side effects, but many more modern pills actually exert anti-androgenic effects.

So perhaps the “masculinization” of women was not all due to feminism pushing women toward being strong and independent, ambitious, leaders, and whatnot. Part of that may have been due to oral contraception use.

Some of the more interesting science is obviously on mate selection.

and one study even found it could influence a woman’s choice of partner.

Inside that study link:

“Ovulating women exhibit a preference for more masculine male features, are particularly attracted to men showing dominance and male-male competitiveness and prefer partners that are genetically dissimilar to themselves. This is significant because there is evidence suggesting that genetic similarity between couples might be linked with infertility. Further, some studies have suggested that men detect women’s fertility status, preferring ovulating women in situations where they can compare the attractiveness of different women.”

[…]

“Of particular interest is the fact that women taking the pill do not exhibit the ovulation-specific attraction to genetically dissimilar partners. “The ultimate outstanding evolutionary question concerns whether the use of oral contraceptives when making mating decisions can have long-term consequences on the ability of couples to reproduce,” suggests Dr. Lummaa.”

Now this is the good stuff.

Contraception basically mimics pregnancy. During pregnancy, women tend to prefer “beta” or “comfort traits” from a partner such as loyalty, being nice, provision, protection, and similar qualities as it signals that men will stick around. This indicates that women will tend to select “beta males” for mate choices prior to marriage.

However, once they get married and come off the contraception and try to get pregnant their repulsion to their spouse is magnified. Especially once they get pregnant for real. Not to mention the fact that it alters selection for mates which may result in infertility, aside from the other infertility from STDs.

Now we’re seeing with many women “chose” to marry men they weren’t really attracted to in the first place. And why divorce is common after a woman comes off birth control and gets pregnant with kids. Her brain thought her spouse was attractive when he wasn’t. I suppose you could liken this to what “beer googles” does for both sexes… it makes you attracted to the members of the opposite sex you would never ask out if you were sober. If you’re a man who likes Scarlett Johansson curves and then you suddenly wake up next to a woman who’s 300 lbs you’d probably be disgusted too.

That’s not even the most surprising part though in my opinion.

As described in Human Brain Mapping, the researchers found that two particular regions, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex, tended to be thinner in those who were taking oral contraceptive pills. The lateral orbitofrontal cortex helps us regulate emotions and is thought to allow us to adapt our behavior in response to rewards or adversities, while the posterior cingulate cortex helps us evaluate our internal states. The researchers told Huffington Post that changes to the former could help to explain why some women experience negative emotional side effects, such as anxiety and depression, when they commence the pill.

Ah, so the particular regions of the brain that are thinned — or rather atrophied — and became dysfunctional are the parts of the brain that “[help] us regulate emotions and is thought to allow us to adapt our behavior in response to rewards or adversities” and “evaluate our internal states.” Also, some women “experience negative emotional side effects, such as anxiety and depression, when they commence the pill.

Am I the only one who sees the irony here? Basically,

  • Women have a more difficult time “regulating their emotions” which means that they go more feral: they’re at the whims of their behavior not chained to any type of logic or reason.
  • Women have a more difficult time seeing the results of “actions and consequences” in terms of reward and adversity
  • Women have a difficult time evaluating their “internal state”… or in other words they’re desensitized to evaluating it so what they feel is their only reality. They can’t evaluate whether that’s true or false. Solipsism.

You can’t make this stuff up folks.

And this article doesn’t even mention that some cancers are increased by hormonal contraception use.

Naturally occurring estrogen and progesterone have been found to influence the development and growth of some cancers. Because birth control pills contain female hormones, researchers have been interested in determining whether there is any link between these widely used contraceptives and cancer risk.

The results of population studies to examine associations between oral contraceptive use and cancer risk have not always been consistent. Overall, however, the risks of endometrial and ovarian cancer appear to be reduced with the use of oral contraceptives, whereas the risks of breast, cervical, and liver cancer appear to be increased (1). A summary of research results for each type of cancer is given below.

Generally, I find that whenever man tries to mess with complex biological systems it doesn’t usually end up that well. We can see this with the food we eat. But apparently, many are blind to the hubris of messing with the human body.

There are other maladies of contraception depending on a woman’s individual body as well. Copper IUDs apparently can make your body go bonkers.

Conclusion: never use hormonal contraception. It’s said to be safe, but it isn’t.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Advice to Christian women and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Oral contraception alters your brain

  1. Feminine But Not Feminist says:

    Reblogged this on Be Feminine, Not Feminist and commented:
    Yet another good reason to NOT take birth control. The stuff is dangerous, seriously.

  2. allamagoosa says:

    Ah, so the particular regions of the brain that are thinned — or rather atrophied — and became dysfunctional are the parts of the brain that “[help] us regulate emotions and is thought to allow us to adapt our behavior in response to rewards or adversities”

    I have observed a difference in the emotional volatility of menstruating women on birth control versus those who aren’t on it. Both are more emotional than usual, but those on contraception seem to be so much more emotionally unstable than those who aren’t. So it seems what I’m observing isn’t so much a difference that occurs just during menstruation, but rather an overall effect that gets magnified during that time. Interesting.

    Although I guess the question now is, “Is the thinning reversible?”. Is it like smoking, where if you quit it eventually heals and you return more or less to normal, or is it permanent?

  3. Feminine But Not Feminist says:

    @ alla

    Although I guess the question now is, “Is the thinning reversible?”. Is it like smoking, where if you quit it eventually heals and you return more or less to normal, or is it permanent?

    That’s a really good question! Lets all hope it’s reversible…

  4. Looking Glass says:

    The atrophy aspects would be the largest concern. Generally speaking, hormones shouldn’t be doing that to the Brain.

    On a complete conjecture, given other cases of induced atrophy of the Brain, my assumption would be that the synthetic hormones are blocking the surface receptors. Though they could be influence the cGMP sub-cycle signaling cascade as well. Generally speaking, if a receptor isn’t used, it’ll not be restored as quickly. Though it would take a close study of the expressed receptor types in those nervous tissue to make more than random speculation. Beyond just pointing out that it’s a real, serious problem for the brain.

    Though, this does explain how the transition to actual repentance is helped along for most Women. If you stop attempting to get laid, the Pill goes as well. That let’s the body repair itself. Though we’d need to see studies on the magnitude of the effect to get a judge for how long the body would take to repair itself. “Years” on the Pill being, likely, the most important factor.

  5. @ LG

    The atrophy aspects would be the largest concern. Generally speaking, hormones shouldn’t be doing that to the Brain.

    Actually, testosterone is what masculinizes the brain early in fetal development and continues to exert effects throughout development. Same into puberty.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if continuous exposure to high(er) level of progesterone and estrogen and other hormones does something to women, just as continuous exposure to testosterone exerts positive and negative effects in competition bodybuilders both male and female.

    All tissues tend to have receptors to the steroid hormones, so they should exert effects on them even outside of development.

  6. Jonadab-the-Rechabite says:

    Birth control is the rejection of what God calls good to replace it with the hope of a consequence free fornication. Autonomy is not liberty from the law of God, it is the sin of attempting to be as gods. It was evil in the garden of Eden and it is evil today.

    God says children are a blessing and that we are to take dominion by subduing the earth and filling it with humans. Humanists doubt the goodness of God to sustain an earth full of people and cannot fathom that dominion could provide the teleology to support them all. Feminists are concerned with dividing up the pie not expanding it. They vote to transfer assets from men to women, they claim their life will be deprived if they give birth and raise children. They fear that they will not realize their own narcissistic ends if they live a life of a meek and quite spirited wife and mother. God says marriage is pure, wives are to be in submission and sex is not to be withheld except for prayer and fasting. Feminists claim that their body is their exclusive jurisdiction and that they can refuse to give birth by giving death, to refuse to populate the earth, reuse sex or give it away according to their own desires. Single sluts, frigid wives and murdering hordes is what has become of modern feminists. Is it any wonder that God has used their own bodies chemicals to allow them to be turned over to a depraved mind.

    Romans 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;

    Birth control not only brings a curse, but is itself a curse. We make poor gods. When we invert what the one God says is good and bad we should expect not just unintended consequences but also the consequences of intentionally embracing evil.

  7. Pingback: Oral Contraceptive Pill Could Be Altering The Physical Structure Of Your Brain | Buy Non GMO Seeds

  8. dvdivx says:

    I think anyone that has deal with steroids can talk about how they can masculinize a man let alone a woman. The problem with the pill is that it would be the equivalent of a 15 year straight steroid cycle (15-30) for most women done without any breaks. The idea that it’s not going to mess your body up is insane at best.
    The ironic thing is that male steroid users who have no government funded research could find out more about hormones and how to regulate them along with side effects all done through users trial and error than the pill which does get government funded research.

  9. @ dvdivx

    Well, anabolic steroid is used for increasing performance for sports where there’s a lot of money. So it’s not that surprising that it developed covertly with “undercover” pharmaceutical companies and athletes. That’s not to knock the anecdotal knowledge from bodybuilders but there is at least some decent trickle effective down from where the bigger money is involved.

  10. Pingback: Semen also alters your brain | Reflections on Christianity and the manosphere

  11. Pingback: Contraception’s under the radar effect on divorce | Christianity and masculinity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s